Page Heading: Debate Central
Discussion Home   |    Search   |    User's Guide   |    FAQ   |    Login   |   

Topic: DNA Fingerprinting and the National DNA Database

You are here:   BEEP/PEEP Discussion Home > DNA Profiling
 

Reply to topic Use the Quote button to reply to a specific message,
or the PostReply button to add to the discussion.

Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4
 
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Posted By Message
cs_33


Joined: 14 Jan 2008
Posts: 3
Location: Castle School - South Gloucestershire
Post subject:
Posted: Fri Jun 27, 2008 9:18 am
Reply with quoteFind all posts by cs_33

rutc_s25 wrote:
I agree with cs_37 that everyone is acting irrationally. I think that people are veering away from the main points of this National Database, in terms of insurance and all that jazz. First of all, we are talking about DNA profiling not gene testing, the kind of information of whether an individual is predisposed to a particular disease would not be available on this database! Surely, a more important issue is that someone could get hold of DNA and use it in order to incriminate that individual for a crime they committed.


we arent thinking irrationally. it is an individuals choice as to whether we want our information on a data base or not, we each have our own reasons which are personal and cannot be labelled as irrational.

the data baout predipositions to diseases may not be readily available on the data base, but surely the fact that a version of our DNA is available will eventually lead to this. we are a curious race and therefore will not be able to leave it at a finger print.

 
   Back to top
cs_41


Joined: 14 Jan 2008
Posts: 1
Location: Castle School - South Gloucestershire
Post subject:
Posted: Fri Jun 27, 2008 9:27 am
Reply with quoteFind all posts by cs_41

I believe that DNA fingerprinting is far from an invasion of our privacy. DNA is a thing that the vast majority of the country have either never thought about or do not understand, therefore they have no arguement that the government are invading thier privacy. As well as this, the government cannot use ones DNA to find out any information about the inidividual that is not genetic, so people cannot argue that DNA finger printing is an invasion of our privacy (they cannot learn anything about the lives we lead or our personalities from our DNA).

Even though i belive this, the concept of DNA finger printing is not practical; it is far too expensive, therefore it will not be put into practice in the near future. Gordon and his merry men will only loose the information anyway.

 
   Back to top
cs_37


Joined: 14 Jan 2008
Posts: 3
Location: Castle School - South Gloucestershire
Post subject:
Posted: Fri Jun 27, 2008 6:43 pm
Reply with quoteFind all posts by cs_37

cs_33 wrote:
we are a curious race and therefore will not be able to leave it at a finger print.


If it's so inevitable that we'll take it further, surely it's inevitable we'll go ahead and do it in the first place?

Of course, it's not - hence this debate. Yes, we're curious, but we're also able to regulate ourselves if something is too crazy. If we, as a society, generally agree a DNA database is a bad thing, we won't have one. If we agree it is a good thing, and then we agree something even bigger than that is not so good, we won't take it further.

The things that this may lead to in the future are a separate discussion entirely, and aren't a logical reason to stop it entirely.

cs_41 wrote:
As well as this, the government cannot use ones DNA to find out any information about the inidividual that is not genetic


They can't use a DNA fingerprint to find out anything that is genetic, either. It stores no information about your actual DNA sequence, it's simply a pattern that is formed that's unique to your DNA.

 
   Back to top
rutc_s18


Joined: 14 Jan 2008
Posts: 4
Location: Richmond upon Thames College - Middlesex
Post subject: cs_37
Posted: Tue Aug 19, 2008 10:33 am
Reply with quoteFind all posts by rutc_s18

I'm sorry but I'll believe you'll find that when they take the sample of DNA for legal reasons they are required to keep it...
although the "junk" DNA contains no genetic information
the DNA sample which they have extracted the junk from does....
therefore they could determine genetic info...

 
   Back to top
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topicReply to topic   Page 4 of 4
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4
You are here:    BEEP/PEEP Discussion Home » DNA Profiling
 



Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group